Origin of life

Before diving into my theory of the origin of life, check if the following assumptions make sense to you. If they do not, perhaps you can find a better investment of your time.

• The most simple, self-contained form of life – bacteria 
• The most complex form of life – humans
• Evolution, from simple to complex life forms has taken place
• A stone is much more simple than the human brain
• The earth is a several billion years old

Chapter 1. Why Darwin’s eveloution theory can’t possibly be right.

It is non-controversial that evolution has taken place, we have non-contoversial genetic and paleontological evidences that are simply non-refutable. But was it Darwinian evolution? This question may sound absurd, because we know of no other evolution. But let’s think about this for a moment. If we look at evolution on a large time scale, we have to accept that evolution has undoubtedly taken place allowing some form of bacterial life (the simplest known form of self-sufficient organism) over a period of several billion years to evolve into the most complex form of life: humans. However, in order to be Darwinian, this evolution has to fulfill one fundamental principal: each subsequent evolutionary step leads to a new organism, which is better adapted to the environment than its ancestor. Therefore, we can expect that the pinnacle of evolution — humans are better adapted to at least some type of environment than the most primitive form of life — bacteria.

Let’s compare:

Humans need at least 13 years plus 9 months to reproduce. Bacteria reproduce every few minutes. Humans need an ambient temperature between 20 and 30 degrees Celsius to feel comfortable. Bacteria can survive any temperature below zero and as high as 100 Celsius.

Bacteria can live everywhere and anywhere on earth. They can utilize anything and everything as a source of food. The best proof of their perfect design is that they have not changed since evolution has began! Nature was not able to come up with anything better adapted than the simplest form of life. The whole evolution, from the bacteria view point, was simply diversification of its diet, which now includes … humans.

Since the pinnacle of evolution is not better adapted to any environment than the starting point, the evolution that we see and which had without any doubts has taken place, cannot possibly be Darwinian. Rather, Darwin accurately described inheritable adaptive changes without increased complexity, which are not really part of evolution from simple to complex life forms.

Thus, Darwinian evolution fails to address the most fundamental evolutionary observation — ever increasing complexity of life, which gives no adaptation advantages.

What kind of evolution was it?

If adaptation to the environment cannot serve as an engine of increased complexity, what does? Since increased complexity gives no evolutionary advantage to life, there are really only two alternative explanations — it is the intrinsic property of life and was inevitable or is the result of intelligent intervention.

What is the possible mechanism of inevitolution of life on earth?

Inheritable changes in complexity of life are a manifestation of changes in DNA. Those changes are acquired through mutations. Theory of evolution says that mutations are random. But are they? There is a well known phenomenon of mutation hotspots and even within hotspots, there is a hierarchy with areas that are more likely to mutate than others. Having areas that are more or less likely to mutate, the inevitolution can be programmed to unravel in a specific order that would be determined solely by intrinsic properties of the initial genetic sequence and will explain the complexity that has no adaptation advantages. This complexity was simply inevitable and needed time and numbers to reveal every pre-existing possibility on a path from a bang to humans who discovered it.